Standard Oral Brainstorming

نویسنده

  • Wendy E. Mackay
چکیده

Much of HCI concentrates on how to critique existing designs. What is more difficult is figuring out how to generate successful new designs, especially designs that are grounded in the real-world needs of the users. While it may be tempting to simply start building prototypes, it is almost always better to start by generating a collection of ideas. Ideas, even impractical or silly, help to create an active design space in which to work. Generating a wide variety of ideas gives designers more options and different problem-solving strategies. In our experience, prototypes are almost always richer and more creative when the designers have started with some form of idea generation exercise.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Equality of Reticence in Groups and Idea Generation: an Empirical Study

Contingency models proposed for group support systems suggest that task, technology, group and individual characteristics may explain observed effects. Task, technology and group characteristics have been studied to some extent. Characteristics of individual participants have received less attention. In this article, the results of an experimental study on the equality of reticence in groups on...

متن کامل

Picturestorming : Ideation via “ Bits of Life ”

This paper describes an artifact-centric approach to a traditional ideation method, brainstorming. Picturestorming uses human-centric images to stimulate ideas in a collaborative setting. In an exploratory study, I found that picturestorming may address limitations of standard brainstorming by reducing evaluation apprehension and production blocking. Pictures also support reflection and group c...

متن کامل

Brainstorming under constraints: why software developers brainstorm in groups

Group brainstorming is widely adopted as a design method in the domain of software development. However, existing brainstorming literature has consistently proven group brainstorming to be ineffective under the controlled laboratory settings. Yet, electronic brainstorming systems informed by the results of these prior laboratory studies have failed to gain adoption in the field because of the l...

متن کامل

Peer-reviewed Brainstorming to Facilitate Large Group Collaboration

This paper examines the impact of peer-reviewed brainstorming on the quality of brainstorming ideas. Peer-reviewed brainstorming aims to improve the quality of the brainstorming ideas and reduce the number of noisy comments. A pilot study was conducted that compared traditional, free brainstorming to a peer-reviewed brainstorming process, which requires each idea to be reviewed and edited by pe...

متن کامل

Making Group Brainstorming More Effective: Recommendations From an Associative Memory Perspective

Much literature on group brainstorming has found it to be less effective than individual brainstorming. However, a cognitive perspective suggests that group brainstorming could be an effective technique for generating creative ideas. Computer simulations of an associative memory model of idea generation in groups suggest that groups have the potential to generate ideas that individuals brainsto...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014